.380 Auto pistol vs carbine

BT PvsC

I am working on the review  of the brand new carbine from Hi-Point in .380 Automatic.  I have been trying to wrap my head around the reasoning behind a .380 Auto carbine when they already make a carbine in 9mm Luger. After the first trip to the range I am starting to understand the premise so I thought it was a good idea to do a ballistic test using popular defensive ammunition and compare that to a small .380 Auto handgun as well as the 9mm Luger carbine.

Suffice it to say there is a great reduction in recoil when going from the 9mm Luger to the .380 Auto in the carbine. There will be more details on the merits of the new .380 Auto carbine in the review but for now we will concentrate on the ballistic test.

380 auto ballistic with carbine

The above chart is a direct comparison from the .380 Auto Diamondback handgun with a 2.8″ barrel vs the Hi-Point carbine with a 16.5″ barrel.

If you are curious how the .380 carbine stacks up against the 9mm Luger carbine, follow this link to see that ballistic test. As for the .45 Automatic pistol vs carbine ballistic test can be found here

BT PvsC-3

Here are the recovered bullets on top of their respected boxes. The Hornady Critical Defense are on the far left of the American Gunner box. The top bullet was shot into bare gel and the bottom bullet into three layers of denim like cloth.  Left bullets were shot from the carbine and right from the pistol. More photos on the .380 bullets recovered that were shot from the Diamondback can be found here.  I apologize for the large number of links but I am trying to provide you with plenty of information on these ballistic tests.

If you have a .380 Auto pistol and have a collection of self defense ammunition the Hi-Point carbine really adds performance to the same round, adding a longer sight radius, and the ability to add accessories.  The carbine had no trouble feeding any of these rounds throughout ballistic and accuracy testing and even added some validity to under performing .380 defensive ammunition from the test pistol. So I am optimistic on this new carbine but we will see when I really put the screws to it and see how it holds up.

Acknowledgments 

Hi-Point 

Hornady 

Ruger Ammunition 

Winchester Ammunition 

 

 

, , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to .380 Auto pistol vs carbine

  1. Richard March 4, 2016 at 8:01 am #

    I think accuracy tests beyond belly range might show a real benefit in using the carbines for those with less than hawk like vision or steady hands?

    • Hunter Elliott March 4, 2016 at 1:17 pm #

      I agree 100%. In the review I am going to test the carbine at 25 and 100 yards to see the difference and compare that to the 25 yard test from a small handgun in .380 Auto.

  2. David March 12, 2016 at 11:40 am #

    Also of note is that in many South American countries, pistol calibers above .380 acp are verboten. So this might explain Hi Point ’s venturing into the 380 territory

    • Hunter Elliott March 12, 2016 at 1:24 pm #

      David I did not know that but that is excellent information. Thanks for the heads up.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Hi-Point carbine in .380 Auto, it does make sense. - Range Hot - April 15, 2016

    […] table. You can also see the benefit of adding a sixteen inch barrel to the .380 Auto by following this link to the ballistic comparison. Right off I noticed the recoil was very mild and the fun factor was […]

Leave a Reply